I had an affair with Vanessa Feltz's cheating fiancé: Businesswoman tells how she fell 'hopelessly in love' with Ben Ofoedu Sharon Osbourne looks chic in wide-leg jeans and a textured jacket as she enjoys a shopping spree in Londonįrom the stunning Norwegian Fjords to historic European cities and the sun-kissed Caribbean, there are so many incredible places to visit and exciting things to do on a P&O Cruises holiday. Ulrika Jonsson slams Vanessa Feltz's cheating ex Ben Ofoedu as she dubs his public apology 'empty'īoris Becker's model daughter Anna Ermakova, 22, makes her debut on Germany's version of Strictly Come Dancing Jourdan Dunn turns heads in a TINY bejewelled mini-skirt and faux fur shrug as she joins chic Simone Ashley at 16Arlington show during LFW providing up to 3 weeks anti-dandruff efficacy*! Suffering from dandruff? A consultant dermatologist shares how to treat your flaking scalp AND give your locks the luxury treatment. before doing Jell-O shots with pals and seeing Adele play Vegas Kim Kardashian bares her sculpted bikini body in VERY skimpy SKIMS Swimwear. Leigh-Anne Pinnock rocks cropped co-ord set at Ahluwalia's LFW show alongside former Little Mix bandmate Jade Thirlwall's beau Jordan Stephens
The system was intentionally designed this way.Inside Stacey Solomon's transformation from single teen mother to millionaire 'mumfluencer' Yet the system prevents individuals from doing the same to corporations because there are punishments for intentional takedown notices, so an individual who issues a bogus takedown on corporate content will more than likely be punished for intentionally doing so.
We need a legal system that encourages them to ensure they do have copyprivileges on something before issuing a takedown and that sanctions huge punishment for those who issue takedowns on content they do not own, regardless of whether it was intentional or not. They can simply create bogus takedowns and, if they later find they do not have the copyprivilege, they can then claim ignorance and not be punished.
These corporations are too lazy to even check and see if they hold a copyright on something before issuing a takedown and they lobby for a legal system that gives them no incentive to do so. And this is one of the problems with our copyprivilege system, it favor big lazy corporations and enables them to shoot first and ask questions later requiring people to be held guilty of infringement until proven innocent.
0 kommentar(er)
